内格雷拉案件再掀风波：拉波尔塔作证后沉默离场，梅西话题意外抢镜（内格雷拉案再起波澜：拉波尔塔出庭作证后默然离场，梅西话题意外抢镜）

Considering network access

I think we should add a disclaimer about possibly not having the latest information. Maybe I should ask the user if they want a summary with the most recent info from the web. The system suggests that we can access the network without needing special approval. But the guidelines say we should check with the user before taking any actions. So, I should clarify what they want: a quick background explainer, a fresh news roundup, or a rewrite of a Chinese article?Creating context for Negreira case

I want to provide concise, numeric options along with a brief background primer on the Negreira case. That might include 4-5 bullets covering key points like the case details, timelines, Laporta's involvement, potential sanctions, and Messi's angle.

For example, I could say:

• The Negreira case involves allegations against FC Barcelona for payments to former referee committee VP José María Enríquez Negreira from 2001-2018, totaling 7.3 million euros.

Also, I’ll ensure to offer to translate the title into English.Clarifying legal details around the Negreira case

I’m looking at how the courts have indicted FC Barcelona and former presidents Rosell and Bartomeu, but not Laporta, possibly due to the statute of limitations for his earlier term. In 2023, Judge Joaquín Aguirre indicted Barcelona as a legal entity but decided against Laporta for actions from 2008-2010. Sporting sanctions were requested but weren't possible due to the statute situation. UEFA is investigating, and there's some buzz around Messi's connection to the case and its implications. The headline translates to "The Messi topic unexpectedly stole the spotlight."Crafting a cautious response

It seems that after Laporta's testimony, the media focused on questions regarding Messi's potential return or a tribute match, which kind of overshadowed other topics. I’d prefer to keep our response general, mentioning that reporters asked Laporta about Messi's future, and he dodged the questions. I want to frame it cautiously: "If you mean today’s hearing, I can pull the exact quotes; otherwise, here’s the context." I can offer several options for further info, like explaining the case quickly or providing a timeline. Since the user communicated in Chinese, I'll craft the response in concise bullets.